The Ladder
From discussion-based to full-scale, and what each is good for.
12 min
| Type | What happens | Tests |
|---|---|---|
| Seminar / workshop | Familiarisation and discussion of the plan | Understanding; identifies obvious gaps cheaply |
| Tabletop | Team talks through a scenario around a table | Decision making, roles, interfaces, assumptions |
| Drill | One procedure practised for real — evacuation, muster, call-out, spill kit deployment | Mechanics and timing of a single activity |
| Functional exercise | Command teams respond in real time to injects, without deploying resources | Communications, escalation, information flow, command |
| Full-scale exercise | Live deployment with casualties, equipment and often emergency services | The whole system end to end, including the friction |
Building a programme
Escalate over time. A full-scale exercise run before the tabletop has exposed the obvious problems simply demonstrates those problems expensively, and tends to demoralise the participants. A sensible annual programme has frequent drills, regular tabletops, at least one functional exercise, and a full-scale exercise at a longer interval.
Include the interfaces
Test with the parties you will actually rely on: emergency services, mutual aid partners, neighbouring sites, corporate crisis teams and contractors. Interface failures — incompatible radios, different terminology, unclear command handover — are only found when the interface is exercised.