Is a Hire the Right Answer?

Questions before the vacancy is approved.

12 min

The default assumption

When someone leaves or workload rises, the reflex is to replace or add. It is worth pausing, because a hire is a long commitment with substantial cost — recruitment, salary, on-costs, management time, and the productivity drag while someone learns.

Questions worth asking:

  • Is the work still needed? A departure is one of the few natural opportunities to examine whether the role's activities still serve a purpose.
  • Could it be redistributed in a way that develops existing people?
  • Could the work be reduced, automated or stopped?
  • Is the role the same? The job that was right five years ago may not be the job needed now, and replacing like-for-like preserves a design nobody has examined.
  • Is permanent employment the right form? Fixed-term, part-time, contract, agency and outsourcing each suit different circumstances.
  • Is this the right level? Organisations routinely re-advertise at the departing person's grade without asking whether the work justifies it.

Defining the role

A job description should state the purpose of the role, the main accountabilities, the reporting relationships, and the scope — budget, people, decisions. Written as outcomes rather than as a list of activities, it remains useful as the work changes.

The person specification is where most recruitment problems originate. It should distinguish:

  • Essential — genuinely required on day one to do the job.
  • Desirable — helpful, and learnable.

Two disciplines make it work. Every requirement must be justifiable and assessable: if you cannot say how you will test it, it does not belong. And requirements must be genuinely necessary rather than conventional — a degree requirement on a role that does not need one, or "five years' experience" where three would do, excludes capable candidates for no reason and narrows the field before you start.

Requirements and discrimination

A requirement that disadvantages a group protected by law must be objectively justifiable as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim. Common problem areas: unnecessary physical requirements; length-of-experience requirements that disadvantage younger candidates or those returning from a career break; inflexible working patterns; and qualification requirements not genuinely needed for the work.

Defining success

Before advertising, write down what this person will have achieved after a year. This clarifies the requirements, gives candidates something meaningful to discuss, and provides the basis for the probation review. A role defined only by activities produces a hire assessed only by effort.

1 of 9

Checking your enrolment…